<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teaching Evolution in Florida</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dancallahan.net/blog/2008/08/24/teaching-evolution-in-florida/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancallahan.net/blog/2008/08/24/teaching-evolution-in-florida</link>
	<description>Education.  Games.  Comics.  Movies.  Stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Allan</title>
		<link>http://dancallahan.net/blog/2008/08/24/teaching-evolution-in-florida/comment-page-1#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancallahan.net/?p=167#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Kia ora Jeff!

While I agree with you in principle there comes a time when the leader/mentor/facilitator/teacher/tutor has to bite bullet. If what is being thought is not aligned by how they are thinking, then the target's not being hit no matter how good the aim appears to be. It is too easy to mistake the 'how' for the 'what'. Science is a discipline, not a set of rules. There are many ways of assessing if the target's been hit, and if 'what' is thought is involved a priori then the learner should be able to also explain the 'how' in support of it.

Ka kite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kia ora Jeff!</p>
<p>While I agree with you in principle there comes a time when the leader/mentor/facilitator/teacher/tutor has to bite bullet. If what is being thought is not aligned by how they are thinking, then the target&#8217;s not being hit no matter how good the aim appears to be. It is too easy to mistake the &#8216;how&#8217; for the &#8216;what&#8217;. Science is a discipline, not a set of rules. There are many ways of assessing if the target&#8217;s been hit, and if &#8216;what&#8217; is thought is involved a priori then the learner should be able to also explain the &#8216;how&#8217; in support of it.</p>
<p>Ka kite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffSlough</title>
		<link>http://dancallahan.net/blog/2008/08/24/teaching-evolution-in-florida/comment-page-1#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffSlough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancallahan.net/?p=167#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>How often we forget that our job is not necessarily to teach them what to think, but rather HOW to think. Even I sometimes have to remind myself to leave my EGO at home.

"Great Spirit, please give me the strength to know when to keep my pie hole shut!"  (Ancient prayer of the enlightened ones).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How often we forget that our job is not necessarily to teach them what to think, but rather HOW to think. Even I sometimes have to remind myself to leave my EGO at home.</p>
<p>&#8220;Great Spirit, please give me the strength to know when to keep my pie hole shut!&#8221;  (Ancient prayer of the enlightened ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
